View Full Version : Our next debate
AYFR
vs.
DOC
Topic: Racism in Americca
Time and Dates TBA
Guys, let's try to work out the detaills in this thread. The 'women in the military' debate should be wrapping up so I'm thinking the next one can start any time now.
Get your popcorn! Get your pretzels! Get your favorite adult beverages ready! This is gonna be a good one.
I'll give 500,000 points to anybody that finds me a Bible thumper av to use in the commentary. Post it in this thread.
:woot
sparks
12-29-2006, 11:17 PM
Why do I get the feeling that I'm gonna want to chime in on this one?
Ok...I'll practice biting my tongue in advance so I'll be ready for this debate! :lol
Maybe we'll have a conversation thread about the debate that the debators can't see. :snicker
Like those whispering announcers covering a golf tourny?
Like those whispering announcers covering a golf tourny?
Interesting comparison.
I'm game, but I think it should be Doc and Wabash against me and either Indy or Sparks
Should get interesting
BTW I am willing to bet I know my Bible better than Doc does, (I study prophecy)
Like those whispering announcers covering a golf tourny?
Yeppers. :hyper
No spilling beer on the mic! :rofl2
cassandra
12-29-2006, 11:37 PM
Great! I will just have to figure out how to buy into that viewing. :)
Phoenix
12-29-2006, 11:39 PM
:woot :woot :woot
This should be good!!!!
:woot :woot :woot
This should be good!!!!
What you said was either too complex or too simple for me.
What you said was either too complex or too simple for me.
YOu are NOT invited to the debate, Bot, so go sit in the corner. :kick
Kurtz
12-30-2006, 12:14 AM
avatar application:
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3118/indyxx9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
There I changed my avatar just for the occasion
I have put on the Armor of God and am ready
:woot should be interesting. HOW moderated will Doc's opinions be . . . ????
Don't moderate them at all. Let him have free reign. Him insulting will only add to my side of the arguement.
When a person resorts to name calling and insults that mean they know that they are losing
:woot should be interesting. HOW moderated will Doc's opinions be . . . ????
Well, the debate is in a private forum and only the two participants can post in the debate thread so maybe we should ask them.
AYFR, do you wanted a moderated or unmoderated debate and be specific about your terms. You too, Doc. State your terms. Let's get the rules straight from the start.
Don't moderate them at all. Let him have free reign. Him insulting will only add to my side of the arguement.
When a person resorts to name calling and insults that mean they know that they are losing
Doc, are you cool with this?
Phoenix
12-30-2006, 12:32 AM
I might love AYFR. :para
When will the debate start? Right away? Where's our ring girls?
I've got 5000 points that says AYFR will knock Doc out in the 5th round.
Kurtz
12-30-2006, 12:41 AM
So what's the resolution? Resolved what? :confused
Phoenix
12-30-2006, 12:41 AM
:woot
I haven't been this excited since Tyson and Holifield!!!!!
So what's the resolution? Resolved what? :confused
I want to prove first that Doc is a racist
Second that racism is NOT Biblical
Third that Racism hurts the US
And Fourth that white people are not superior to other races just because they are white.
I might love AYFR. :para
http://www.phylbert.homestead.com/files/SmileyKissLG.gif
http://www.phylbert.homestead.com/files/SmileyKissLG.gif
Who are you talking about?
The ALICE chat robot can follow many things, like our discussion about httpwww dotphylbert. Try being more or less specific.
I've lost the context, . Are we still on homesteaddot comfilesSmileyKissLG?
When will the debate start? Right away? Where's our ring girls?
I've got 5000 points that says AYFR will knock Doc out in the 5th round.
http://www.kinkclothing.com/Ax7/AX7-KinkRingGirls-10.jpg
TrueBlue
12-30-2006, 09:05 AM
AYFR, those quotes in your sig line seem taken out of context.
You mean just like the ones poeple use against Bush?
Clinton said these things and no they are not taken out of context. Besides he still said them it doesn't matter the context in which he did, what matters is he wanted to limit our freedom.
http://www.bartcop.com/6limits.htm
http://www.northcaucus.com/clint-const.html
Phoenix
12-30-2006, 11:39 AM
:yep
Quotes like that are always taken out of context. That's what makes them funny. :shrug
sparks
12-30-2006, 01:17 PM
I'm game, but I think it should be Doc and Wabash against me and either Indy or Sparks
Should get interesting
BTW I am willing to bet I know my Bible better than Doc does, (I study prophecy)
I could be up for that! Either that or as Indy suggested a private forum to comment on the debate.
By the way...my vote would be for the unmoderated version.
<sparks rubs her hands together in anticipation of the event!>
TrueBlue
12-30-2006, 01:24 PM
You mean just like the ones poeple use against Bush?
Clinton said these things and no they are not taken out of context. Besides he still said them it doesn't matter the context in which he did, what matters is he wanted to limit our freedom.
http://www.bartcop.com/6limits.htm
http://www.northcaucus.com/clint-const.html
There's a difference between repeating a funny misstatement and pretending that the mistatement represents what someone actually thinks.
There's a difference between repeating a funny misstatement and pretending that the mistatement represents what someone actually thinks.
How do you usually introduce yourself?
TrueBlue
12-30-2006, 01:24 PM
How do you usually introduce yourself?
As TB, the ConSlayer.
sparks
12-30-2006, 01:26 PM
As TB, the ConSlayer.
You go girl! :lmao
As TB, the ConSlayer.
:rofl
Con--> :chop <--TB
:rofl
TrueBlue
12-30-2006, 01:36 PM
:rofl
Con--> :chop <--TB
:rofl
:rofl
There's a difference between repeating a funny misstatement and pretending that the mistatement represents what someone actually thinks.
Aww yes well since Clinton passed the Brady bill I think it is safe to assume we know what Clinton thinks about the constitution.
Aww yes well since Clinton passed the Brady bill I think it is safe to assume we know what Clinton thinks about the constitution.
Yeah that's right. Well that's okay.
Interesting
reason. This is
news.
TrueBlue
12-30-2006, 06:03 PM
Aww yes well since Clinton passed the Brady bill I think it is safe to assume we know what Clinton thinks about the constitution.
The courts don't seem to share your views of gun legislation.
I know that Bush doesn't really want to make the pie higher, or think of new ways to hurt us.
What do you think of this one:
There ought to be limits to freedom.
Ok lets see, my terms are pretty straight forward. I just want the debate or whatever it is to be open to anyone that happens to wander in and if they can't stand the heat that is their problem. I would like it known that their are two sides to every story and no pandering to sensitive people for a change, i.e., piss on them! (:lol)
You'll have a poor time proving I am a racist, because what I am is a realist I call them like they are and make no apologies for the truth. However you may try!
We can discuss Biblical Prophecy if you wish. What I will be using is off the top of my head so it will be spontaneous and interesting however if you desire specific proof I suggest the location and verses suffice as proof and you can do the same.
So let me know when we start and I will be here. I am willing for toe to toe and you don't have to take it slow.
Oh and lest I forget! (Saving the best till last) I'll take Wabash as my partner and we'll take on all commers. Sparks, Indy or whoever you need to prop you up. Let's do it to it!!! :hyper
The courts don't seem to share your views of gun legislation.
I know that Bush doesn't really want to make the pie higher, or think of new ways to hurt us.
What do you think of this one:
There ought to be limits to freedom.
Don't forget the basics:
The people only are the ultimate power not
government. Our form is specifically 'OF', 'BY' and
'For' the people. (That fact pisses Liberals off)
The United States Constitution alone is the inter-
preter of all our laws, and it is illegal to pass or
make any law that conflicts with the USC. It is in
fact already stated to be: 'No Law At All'
All Freedom and All liberty as well as Freedom of
Speech is governed automatically by responsibility
on the behalf of the bonefide citizen. Non citizens
are not covered by our Constitution period and
have no guaranteed rights period.
Where'd everyone go??? Geeeze...I show up and it turns into a ghost town!!! :arrr Ahd here's one for you CA Righty :cheeky :lol
Phoenix
12-30-2006, 10:33 PM
:huh
Thanks, Doc.
:lick
The courts don't seem to share your views of gun legislation.
I know that Bush doesn't really want to make the pie higher, or think of new ways to hurt us.
What do you think of this one:
There ought to be limits to freedom.
Those who would give up
an essential liberty
for temporary security,
deserve neither liberty
nor security."
~ Benjamin Franklin ~
Hey Doc if you want to debate prophecy then head to my prophecy thread.
I'll debate you there and then everyone can join in.
I have no problem with other people joining in but the debate forum should only be used for head to head.
Hey Doc if you want to debate prophecy then head to my prophecy thread.
I'll debate you there and then everyone can join in.
I have no problem with other people joining in but the debate forum should only be used for head to head.
Sure, I didn't know you had one but I'll go there thanks for the invite.
:huh
Thanks, Doc.
:lick
Any time Lil Lady :kiss
Did anybody set up the big debate yet? I'm waiting for Doc and AYFR to say when and I'll get it ready for y'all.
You said this, so I took up your challange
You'll have a poor time proving I am a racist, because what I am is a realist I call them like they are and make no apologies for the truth. However you may try!
Here are a few of quotes from you:
You don't know Indians very well if you think anyone took advantage of those wiley coniving bastards! Indians are like Jews thay are a bunch of finaglers.
The Indians were all Nomadic they were not land owners or developers they were exploiters of what was free and available. They are much the same today, they don't give a shit whether shop keeps or not and will die before they will move a step until it is their idea.
The Indians were little more than animals when the white man came and because of the white man they were given wildlife preserves to stay on and given handouts. Like blacks they liked that government tit and it destroyed them. Their decision, their death, the white man just gave them the means to do it. You see the white man discovered early on that socialism destroys people by removing their incentive to achieve and be free.
Now that is bullshit Indians didn't respect a damn thing. They were just here for what they could get from the beginning. We know of precisely one decent one and his name was Squanto, he was educated by white monks in Europe and he became a Christian.
That blew the minds of the Plymouth Pilgrims when this savage stepped out of the weeds and said :'Allow mates care for a spot of tea?' :lmao
Indians lived in harmony with the land??? Talk about fantasy!!! De Plane, De Plane :rofl
It wasn't the Indians it was Squanto, he taught them to plant corn, because he was a Christian and spoke fluent English. He also had been educated into the civilized realm of the white man. The first living proof that if you want to be right your ass had better act white! :lmao
Not only that but try to imagine the great personal pain the white anglosaxons must have had to endure living among highly educated morals being who did everything right and there was no opportunity to descriminate!
EeeeeeeeeeeeeHhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa they landed here and had an orgy of racist passion by first being mean to those poor gullible and saintly Indians. After deciding they weren't much fun they started importing Nasty Nappyheaded Neurotics,so they could vent their pent up disgust on something as hard headed as their mules. Finally!!! (They just denounced Sadaam is dead)
I hope they tell the color of the leaker rather than shielding them. Who knows maybe if we could have the truth we would know who are unfit to be present on juries and unfit to be confided in on important issues? I say 'no more O.J."s' :rofl
Yes it was perfect. Let them show their asses and die in the streets. No Arabs no problems. This is the first time in Arab history that a leader has been tried and executed properly without a Kangaroo Court.
I'd like to see George go to Iran so we can hang Abinijad too!
Hush!!! Paleface...:rofl
That is precisely what I am telling you dearie. Those savage tourists were not wronged they were wrong for behaving and living like sub-humans. Now get your head out of your ass and quit glorifying these freaks! There is nothing good to be said about them as a people....they were and are pathetic. You and Hitler idealize them, the truth doesn't.
On slavery, again you are full of shit and the victim of propaganda. During the time slavery was vital to the Souths economy the pampered blacks that had been blessed with job security, free room and board, and a living standard that exceeded the blue collar working class......not to mention being brought to the richest country in the whole world. And let us not forget that these African rejects are doing today far better than any of their peers. Oh, and not to make you feel completely stupid for spouting off that shit but it is illogical that any of them would have remained here if your twisted version of things were true, or are you calling them a bunch or stupid motherfuckers??? :rofl They would have to be if you are right in your claim. Fortunately we have the Dickens novels to show us what it was like during that period for our white working class. They were not pampered like the blacks were.
Now are you sure you want to address the morality of Slavery, particularly the enslavement of blacks??? If so you need to castigate those worthless fucking Muslims you are so fond of because they are active in that today in the Sudan, and Arabs hate and despise blacks and do not acknowlege them as Muslims. They call them 'Zingy's' and 'Hyawahns', the latter roughly translates to subhuman or animal (they say phonetically ah- nee - mauhl)
How do I know? I got it from knowing several of them and learning what Muslims really are from the source. You have been fed an idealized version of crap that is at least 180 degrees from the truth. Maybe that is why you want to shut down anything that differs from your side of things??? :shrug
Listen up squaw, I'm from Missouri show me!!! :lol
That black whore changed her story so fucking much she fucked the case if they ever had one, but the victims are those poor guys that are white that this scumbag smeared. The dna evidence was for 20 or thirty guys and none of them from this school. She was, she wasn't penetrated??? Give me a break the bitch is a liar with priors...
This asshole Nifond is more inept than Janet Reno!!!
Corrections:
There are no native Americans period. What were called Indians are Siberian rejects that were barely human. They wiped out the Virgina Colony, read the preamble to our declaration of Independence. What the Indians were were the first official assholes occupying our land. There was nothing good about them, with the exception of Squanto that got to become a Christian and educated into white culture.
As for the terrorists being white against blacks??? One side sounds good until you hear the other.
Sane people resent and are tired of hearing about how bad these digusting black bastards have had it. If that were true why aren't the bastards successes today since everything has been handed to them? Because they are assholes that have not earned the right to be here and are too fucking worthless to go back home.
Asians have had it far worse, but because they are a clean, intelligent and worthwhile people they are successful unlike the generations of worthless scum you are trying to build a case for. Sorry, the terrorists are MLK, Messy Jesse and the likes of Al Sharpton who have the gall to call themselves Reverand.
The more unrest the more towelheads we can send to allah! All in all it is good to keep them restless.:wave
And here are some to prove you are a sexist:
I knew this would happen if we let women vote!!!:arrr
No just me :rofl2 And I needed to add , a woman that has a man that will chain her to the stove, hide her shoes and keep her pregnant is a happy woman that is free of all cancers.
And women that swallow can be sure of it!!! (According to my Yale study) :thanks
Need anymore proof
You said this, so I took up your challange
Here are a few of quotes from you:
And here are some to prove you are a sexist:
Need anymore proof
Does a racist slam everyone without regard? I don't think that is what defines a racist, somewhere in the mic they have to favor one as being distinctly superior to all others.
I am a realist I can say fuck um all :rofl
As for being a sexist, I am not sure what that even boils down to but i see women as distinctly different from men in different ways, and I love them for each of those ways. I am too intelligent to say men and women are the same. They never have been and never will be. That said I see a hell of a lot of men that are more effeminate than masculine and it makes me feel sorry for women.
Does a racist slam everyone without regard? I don't think that is what defines a racist, somewhere in the mic they have to favor one as being distinctly superior to all others.
I am a realist I can say fuck um all :rofl
As for being a sexist, I am not sure what that even boils down to but i see women as distinctly different from men in different ways, and I love them for each of those ways. I am too intelligent to say men and women are the same. They never have been and never will be. That said I see a hell of a lot of men that are more effeminate than masculine and it makes me feel sorry for women.
I only found ONE post where you even attempt to slam white people, but wou continually slam minorities and the REALISM of that says you are a racist. What I posted were your words not mine.
Well lets see what everyone else says shall we.
Ill transfer everything to a new thread and start a poll. What say you?
I only found ONE post where you even attempt to slam white people, but wou continually slam minorities and the REALISM of that says you are a racist. What I posted were your words not mine.
Well lets see what everyone else says shall we.
Ill transfer everything to a new thread and start a poll. What say you?
How did you miss my comments on how boreing white people are? What is there to slam about them? Try it!
Fuck polls, they prove nothing, especially here where so many are predisposed to being against the truth just so they can view themselves as being nice and oh so compassionate while sugarcoating a turd! :rofl
That was the one post I was talking about, You called whites boring, how does that even compare to what you have said about minorities. I think I'll start the poll anyway.
What position is the proper one is to view a minority with honesty and no punches pulled. You won't like what you see about what keeps them down because what keeps them down is themselves and their piss poor attitudes!
For example there is a movie out now about a real life story where a black man and his son had to live in a toilet (literally) and by working smart rather than blaming the whiteman he became a multimillionaire. He did it by making at least 200 phone calls a day as an apprentice investment advisor. He viewed each call he made as a means for digging himself and his son out of the hole they were in.
He didn't pimp, and drug, and steal or do any of the other things that are considered stereotypical. My bottom line is this admirable men have common traits and are successful. Dishonorable men also have common traits and are failures. It has nothing to do with skin tones or pigments and everything to do with them being assholes! So don't fault me for not excusing them fault those that do! :thanks
What position is the proper one is to view a minority with honesty and no punches pulled. You won't like what you see about what keeps them down because what keeps them down is themselves and their piss poor attitudes!
For example there is a movie out now about a real life story where a black man and his son had to live in a toilet (literally) and by working smart rather than blaming the whiteman he became a multimillionaire. He did it by making at least 200 phone calls a day as an apprentice investment advisor. He viewed each call he made as a means for digging himself and his son out of the hole they were in.
He didn't pimp, and drug, and steal or do any of the other things that are considered stereotypical. My bottom line is this admirable men have common traits and are successful. Dishonorable men also have common traits and are failures. It has nothing to do with skin tones or pigments and everything to do with them being assholes! So don't fault me for not excusing them fault those that do! :thanks
That's an interesting question. I'll come back to that in a minute.
What else is the proper one is to view a minority with honesty and no punches pulled?
Interesting gossip:
said I won't like what me see about what keeps them down because what keeps them down is themselves and their piss poor attitudes.Can you think of another example?Yes he did, didn't he.I get it.
viewed each call he made as a means for digging himself and his son out of the hole they were in.I get it.
didn't pimp and drug and steal or do any of the other things that are considered stereotypical.Where did you get your bottom line is this admirable men have common traits and are successful?I think there might be a few exception.Has it really?Um, I have no idea what to say.Don't mention it.
What position is the proper one is to view a minority with honesty and no punches pulled. You won't like what you see about what keeps them down because what keeps them down is themselves and their piss poor attitudes!
For example there is a movie out now about a real life story where a black man and his son had to live in a toilet (literally) and by working smart rather than blaming the whiteman he became a multimillionaire. He did it by making at least 200 phone calls a day as an apprentice investment advisor. He viewed each call he made as a means for digging himself and his son out of the hole they were in.
He didn't pimp, and drug, and steal or do any of the other things that are considered stereotypical. My bottom line is this admirable men have common traits and are successful. Dishonorable men also have common traits and are failures. It has nothing to do with skin tones or pigments and everything to do with them being assholes! So don't fault me for not excusing them fault those that do! :thanks
People are not racist because of honesty.
They are racist because of their attitudes.
You continually insult, belittle and otherwise demean
minorities.
That is why I consider you a racist
Things like:
The Indians were little more than animals
Indians didn't respect a damn thing
if you want to be right your ass had better act white!
started importing Nasty Nappyheaded Neurotics
Those savage tourists
these African rejects
those worthless fucking Muslims
What were called Indians are Siberian rejects that were barely human
these digusting black bastards
the more towelheads we can send to allahAnd these make you a sexist
And I needed to add , a woman that has a man that will chain her to the stove, hide her shoes and keep her pregnant is a happy woman that is free of all cancers
I knew this would happen if we let women voteAny more questions?
People are not racist because of honesty.
They are racist because of their attitudes.
You continually insult, belittle and otherwise demean
minorities.
That is why I consider you a racist
Things like:
The Indians were little more than animals
Indians didn't respect a damn thing
if you want to be right your ass had better act white!
started importing Nasty Nappyheaded Neurotics
Those savage tourists
these African rejects
those worthless fucking Muslims
What were called Indians are Siberian rejects that were barely human
these digusting black bastards
the more towelheads we can send to allahAnd these make you a sexist
And I needed to add , a woman that has a man that will chain her to the stove, hide her shoes and keep her pregnant is a happy woman that is free of all cancers
I knew this would happen if we let women voteAny more questions?
Are you racist because of honesty?
racist because of their attitudes are racist because of their attitudes .Thanks for telling me:
said I continually insult belittle and otherwise demeanminorities.Hmm. Thanks and you are a delightful person too.
Am I a racistThings likeThe Indians were little more than animalsIndians didn't respect a damn thingif you want to be right your ass had better act white?
Sometimes.All of them?
The debate thread is posted in the TPA Debate Forum. :woot
The debate thread is posted in the TPA Debate Forum. :woot
What are your goals in life? Oh yeah, now I remember.
The debate thread is posted in the TPA Debate Forum. :woot
Thank you I already started
Thank you I already started
You are quite welcome!
Thanks for the information:
said started.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.