PDA

View Full Version : Obama Under Scrutiny


Wabash
03-14-2008, 07:09 PM
Friday, March 7, 2008 8:52 AM

By: Michael Reagan
It’s inevitable that a lot of people are taking credit for the outcome of the Texas and Ohio primaries. In reality, the outcome was more or less the result of “Saturday Night Live.”

Think about it. They were the ones who sicced the media on Barack Obama by spoofing them for treating him with soft kid gloves.

The skit was so effective that Mrs. Clinton was able to use it during the debate the following week, where she suggested that perhaps Obama needed a pillow.

The effect of Hillary’s sarcasm and the earlier "SNL" skit was to spur the media to take a closer look at Obama, whom they had all but elevated to sainthood over the past year.

So they began to look below the surface. Lo and behold, out popped Tony Rezko and what has become known as “Naftagate,” the word coined by delighted Clinton campaign staffers to describe secret talks between an Obama campaign official and Canadian bureaucrats.

On the very eve of the crucial primaries, the media had created serious doubts about Obama’s credibility by exposing the falsity of his denials that any such negotiations had taken place.

The effect of that revelation in Ohio, where NAFTA is a dirty word, was devastating. Here was Obama attacking the Clinton’s backing of the North American Free Trade Agreement and promising to junk the treaty until it was renegotiated while at the same time a top official of his campaign was telling the Canadians sotto voce that he really didn’t mean it — it was all just campaign rhetoric.

It got even worse when Obama held a press conference and answered a mere eight questions, and when the pressure got too strong he turned his back on the media and walked away. If you want to provoke the media to get hot on your heels and dig deeper into your clouded background, that’s the way to do it.

As long as the media and the rest of us play in his sandbox, and on his terms, Barack Obama loves the playing field. As soon as the game moves out of his sandbox, it seems to unnerve him.

When you are president of the United States of America, you are constantly playing in other people’s sandboxes, and if you don’t know how to play the game outside of your own sandbox you don’t belong in the White House sandbox.(Read Obama)

In the space of a couple of days, Barack Obama showed that he is not equipped to be president of the United States. He showed that he folds under pressure. As long as he was treated by the media as being above criticism he seemed immune from the attacks ordinary mortals endure when running for office.

Once the media stopped worshiping at the Obama altar and was forced to take a close look at him, however, he lost his immunity and was shown to be a mere human like the rest of us.

Whatever new disclosures about Obama emerge in the coming months — and you can be sure there will be some because the Clinton attack machine never runs on idle — he can be expected to react as he did last week: angry and resentful that his treatment at the media’s hands was a case of lèse-majesté.

As last week proved, he was not garbed in regal splendor but instead was stark naked.

The would-be emperor had no clothes.
http://www.newsmax.com/reagan/obama_media/2008/03/07/78617.html

GO Michael Reagan...You Da Man!

issac the dragon
03-14-2008, 08:24 PM
The media treatment of Obama as an ordinary mortal lasted one and a half days. We are back to normal now. Everything Clinton does is racist and mean, and his right to the prize is not in dispute.

I don't hate Obama, but I do dislike the fact that his supporters seem to feel that it is unAmerican to challenge him. That it is wrong to question what he is and what he has done. He has not done much. He supports children, and wounded soldiers. And a hospital his wife was vice president of, and a company that one of his close friends was part of. He has never fought a hard fight. Never supported a difficult idea. Never proposed a bill that might be used by those who oppose him. Because he is an empty suit? I don't think so. I think he has been running for president for a long time, and made sure he left no paper trail.

Saguaro
03-14-2008, 08:25 PM
This thread is being moved

Wabash
03-14-2008, 09:40 PM
This thread is being moved

That's 3 threads of mine moved out of where they should be....it's national politics issues, they should remain there!

Saguaro
03-14-2008, 09:42 PM
They are controversial and they shall be moved

Trueblue
03-14-2008, 09:46 PM
The media treatment of Obama as an ordinary mortal lasted one and a half days. We are back to normal now. Everything Clinton does is racist and mean, and his right to the prize is not in dispute.

I don't hate Obama, but I do dislike the fact that his supporters seem to feel that it is unAmerican to challenge him. That it is wrong to question what he is and what he has done. He has not done much. He supports children, and wounded soldiers. And a hospital his wife was vice president of, and a company that one of his close friends was part of. He has never fought a hard fight. Never supported a difficult idea. Never proposed a bill that might be used by those who oppose him. Because he is an empty suit? I don't think so. I think he has been running for president for a long time, and made sure he left no paper trail.

Voting against the Iraq war was anything but an easy vote at the time. Supporting universal health care is difficult. Most of his platform doesn't play well with the loud mouth radical right.

Maybe people have a hard time attacking him because he is rarely in attack mode.

Ringo
03-16-2008, 04:23 AM
The media treatment of Obama as an ordinary mortal lasted one and a half days. We are back to normal now. Everything Clinton does is racist and mean, and his right to the prize is not in dispute.

I don't hate Obama, but I do dislike the fact that his supporters seem to feel that it is unAmerican to challenge him. That it is wrong to question what he is and what he has done. He has not done much. He supports children, and wounded soldiers. And a hospital his wife was vice president of, and a company that one of his close friends was part of. He has never fought a hard fight. Never supported a difficult idea. Never proposed a bill that might be used by those who oppose him. Because he is an empty suit? I don't think so. I think he has been running for president for a long time, and made sure he left no paper trail.

Think of him like the LIE of Global Warming hype, when just because some group says something and the sheep start rolling in shit and the LIE gets bigger etc...

I almost think we could deal with Hillary better than O Dummy's AGENDA! Me personally I will never buy a prayer blanket, how about you??:theman:pb:godzilla:godzilla

Ringo
03-16-2008, 04:27 AM
They are controversial and they shall be moved

Sag your LIBERAL bias is showing again as YOU can't deal with issues, backed by LINKS, that are negative towards your LYING candidates??


P.S. Sag, POLITICS are controversial...see Political Science 101!!!!:mw:mw:mw:sparks2

Trueblue
03-16-2008, 05:53 AM
Suddenly, Mc:cane, whom Rush said would destroy the Publican party, is not so bad after all, and Hillary, who is a human devil, is better than that black guy after all.

:rofl

Trueblue
03-16-2008, 06:11 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright#_note-6

Trueblue
03-16-2008, 06:15 AM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3177684.ece

BartonX
03-16-2008, 01:39 PM
They are controversial and they shall be moved

Don't you feel stupid saying ignorant shit like this??? This is supposed to be a forum to discuss issues hell yes there is going to be controversy that is what discussion is . Moving these threds are the work of assholes trying to censor anything that is in conflict with their lying bullshit! That happens when you have unfit moderators that are not needed in the first place. What a croc of shit!

BartonX
03-16-2008, 01:48 PM
The point is Obama has been identified as a dyed in the wool Marxist by the lips of his own so called spiritual advisor and mentor Jeremiah Wright.

Wright disclosed in his interview that the core beliefs of the church/mosque Barak has attended for some 25 years is Liberation Theology as taught in Nicaragua That evil cult was exposed to the world by a Catholic Priest in Nicaragua as being pure Marxism!

Obama, had an affinity for getting close with the Marxist radical professors at the colleges he attended. Obama, has a brother "Roger", that is a muslim radical in Africa that is involved in forcing Shiria Law on its victims.

As a confirmed Marxist/Muslim he is not fit to hold any political office or retain his citizenship. I say send his ass to Gitmo, waterboard him and find out just how deep his Anti-American roots are.

Trueblue
03-16-2008, 01:58 PM
Bart, you know that just isn't true.

Trueblue
03-16-2008, 02:03 PM
Don't you feel stupid saying ignorant shit like this??? This is supposed to be a forum to discuss issues hell yes there is going to be controversy that is what discussion is . Moving these threds are the work of assholes trying to censor anything that is in conflict with their lying bullshit! That happens when you have unfit moderators that are not needed in the first place. What a croc of shit!

It's the opposite of censorship, actually. These threads are moved to a forum that gets a huge amount of attention and traffic, and they are allowed to stand as written, with the exception of the most extreme comments.

That you guys get so worked up about this stuff is hilarious. Start your own board and show us all how it ought to be done. Go for it, it's not that expensive, and you and Ringo can have your own way all day every day.