PDA

View Full Version : Baby Sent Through X-Ray Machine at LAX


Indy
12-20-2006, 09:00 AM
Baby is sent through X-ray machine at LAX
A woman places her month-old grandson in a bin for carry-on items. Doctors later determine he did not get a dangerous dose of radiation.
By Jennifer Oldham, Times Staff Writer
December 20, 2006

A woman going through security at Los Angeles International Airport put her month-old grandson into a plastic bin intended for carry-on items and slid it into an X-ray machine.

The early Saturday accident — bizarre but not unprecedented — caught airport workers by surprise, even though the security line was not busy at the time, officials said.

A screener watching the machine's monitor immediately noticed the outline of a baby and pulled the bin backward on the conveyor belt.

The infant was taken to Centinela Hospital, where doctors determined that he had not received a dangerous dose of radiation.

Officials, who declined to release the 56-year-old woman's name, said she spoke Spanish and apparently did not understand English.

She initially didn't want the baby transported to a hospital, but security officials called paramedics and insisted that the child be examined by a doctor.

The grandmother and the child were subsequently allowed to board an Alaska Airlines flight to Mexico City.

The rare incident drew attention to whether officials are staffing often-busy security checkpoints enough to prevent such an accident. And it raised questions about the danger of X-rays used to pick out suspicious metal shapes in passenger bags, given the medical community's warnings that even low amounts of radiation can build up over a lifetime...MORE HERE (http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-baby20dec20,0,4869996.story)


:no3 What the heck is wrong with people???????

FunDeeMental
12-20-2006, 09:03 AM
:cuckoo

sparks
12-20-2006, 09:08 AM
Oh man! Poor kid!

Sweet Tart
12-20-2006, 09:13 AM
Idiot.

AYFR
12-20-2006, 09:13 AM
:cuckoo :cuckoo :cuckoo

Semantics
12-20-2006, 09:28 AM
:para

Dawn
12-20-2006, 10:28 AM
Officials, who declined to release the 56-year-old woman's name, said she spoke Spanish and apparently did not understand English.

Any more questions?

Indy
12-20-2006, 11:14 AM
Any more questions?

What are you trying to say? :toetap

sparks
12-20-2006, 11:54 AM
I tend to think the airport had a responsibility to help people through security...especially if they couldn't speak the language.

I'd hate to be in France and nobody help me just cause I could only speak English. I'd appreciate any extra effort they could give me in helping me to adhere to the local security customs .

Of course I've been through enough airports by now that I would have enough sense to not put my baby through the x-ray. :lol

But if it was this gals first time flying I could see where she could be confused, especially if she didn't speak the language of the country she was passing through.

There are many international travelers going through many countries. They need to be accommodated by the airline / airport staff.

Indy
12-20-2006, 12:12 PM
There's only one problem with your argument, Sparks. We are talking about LAX. All the signs are in multiple languages. I agree with you in that I can see how she could get confused but there ARE people there to help that speak Spanish fluently.

Maybe this should be addressed as a security issue. Somebody was obviously asleep at the wheel and not paying attention to what the people in line were doing.

sparks
12-20-2006, 12:14 PM
There's only one problem with your argument, Sparks. We are talking about LAX. All the signs are in multiple languages. I agree with you in that I can see how she could get confused but there ARE people there to help that speak Spanish fluently.

Maybe this should be addressed as a security issue. Somebody was obviously asleep at the wheel and not paying attention to what the people in line were doing.

Agreed.

Phoenix
12-20-2006, 03:09 PM
I really don't think the security people should be expected to make sure folks aren't putting their babies into x-ray machines. Some things are just common sense. They have SECURITY to think about. If she was lame enough to do that then the babies parents obviously should not have trusted it's care to her and it is on them. Not the security folks. What's next, wanting them to make sure the formula bottles are at the right temp and diapers are changed in a timely manner? :lmao

Indy
12-20-2006, 03:21 PM
I really don't think the security people should be expected to make sure folks aren't putting their babies into x-ray machines. Some things are just common sense. They have SECURITY to think about. If she was lame enough to do that then the babies parents obviously should not have trusted it's care to her and it is on them. Not the security folks. What's next, wanting them to make sure the formula bottles are at the right temp and diapers are changed in a timely manner? :lmao

In the airports I've flown in, there were lots of 'officials' standing around the x-ray machines. I consider keeping a baby out of an x-ray machine a security issue as pressing as terrorism. Safety is part of security.

That's a pretty big leap about the bottles and diapers. Since the x-ray machine is required by the airport, it is their job to monitor it and make sure it doesn't injure anybody even if it is the person's own fault.

Obviously, the woman wasn't real bright. I can't imagine putting a baby in one of those even if I didn't know what the heck was going on around me. I would be holding the baby tighter.

cassandra
12-20-2006, 04:10 PM
This is certainly a safety issue. Somebody was looking in the wrong direction. :(

Phoenix
12-20-2006, 04:41 PM
Yeah. The grandmother. :roll