View Full Version : An Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket?
Capitalist
03-06-2008, 08:46 PM
Nit likely
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Inside-US-poll-battle-as.3854371.jp
Trueblue
03-06-2008, 08:51 PM
We'll see.
Ringo
03-07-2008, 09:27 AM
That would be the in Top 3 most idiotic, Un American, Criminal Tickets in our History, led by:
Clinton-Gore
Carter-Mondale
Clinton-O'dummy
LBJ ticket was offset by the stupid, yet halfway honest, Humphrey's
God what a sickening thought:wall:yuck:yuck:butt
Sweet Tart
03-07-2008, 09:33 AM
I'd like to see someone else brought on... that might be my political ADD though :para
Saguaro
03-07-2008, 09:33 AM
Obama/Edwards
patriotsblade
03-07-2008, 09:35 AM
Obama/Sebilius
Obama/Henry
Obama/Hagel
Clinton/Obama ... she's the older, more experienced candidate who has paid the most dues and been more vetted.
Saguaro
03-07-2008, 10:00 AM
And owes more to companies
Capitalist
03-07-2008, 11:34 AM
Obama/Edwards
Great a empty suit socialist and a hypocrit socialist.
Just what America needs to become another Venezuela.
Capitalist
03-07-2008, 11:40 AM
Clinton/Obama ... she's the older, more experienced candidate who has paid the most dues and been more vetted.
Gee you get that line frm Clintons website?
Experienced doing what?
She likes to claim she had something to do with every positive thing that happpened during her husbakds admin, but somehow she had nothing to do with any of the unpopular stuff. Imagine that.
You know my wife has lived with me for almost 14 years.
She has seen me work at home and program computers a bunch of times. She does not get to put on her resume that she is an experienced programmer.
She was First lady, un-elected and unaccountable for those times. They will not even release infor that might show how involved she was.
Being there is not experience. She can claim only her time in the Senatre as Experience and she only got there because she was Bills' wife...
Yawn to her 'experience'.
toxic
03-07-2008, 12:35 PM
Gee you get that line frm Clintons website?
Experienced doing what? ....
That is a good question. As Bradley pointed out the other night, she didn't even have a Security Clearance when she was first lady, so WTF could she have been involved in??????????
They would have thrown her ass out of any important meeting :rofl
Back on topic, either Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama is spelled the same, Loser/Loser.
issac the dragon
03-07-2008, 01:18 PM
I'd vote for Clinton/Obama but not Obama/Clinton. That would be the one thing that the Democrats could do to keep me from voting. That would be the last, fatal insult that could be heaped on the head of that woman. To ask her to be his vp. Uh-uh.
Capitalist
03-07-2008, 01:28 PM
I'd vote for Clinton/Obama but not Obama/Clinton. That would be the one thing that the Democrats could do to keep me from voting. That would be the last, fatal insult that could be heaped on the head of that woman. To ask her to be his vp. Uh-uh.
Don't worry, her ego would never let her be a VP on ANY ticket.
That woman (I will try to refrain from caller her a bitch or a shrew for the rest of the campaign) thinks she is entitled to be president.
Just her aire of superiority is hard to watch.
I try to watch her on the news but i just can't, even her voice is like fingers on a chalk board to me.
Yellowdogtexan
03-07-2008, 01:38 PM
If you look at the polling results clinton needs Senator Obama on the ticket or risks losing a large number of voters and states. Senator Obama does not need Senator Clinton on the ticket because most of her voters will go democratic anyway except for some Lieberman types. That is why she is the one floating the concept of a clinton/obama ticket. Again, she has not dealt with the fact that she is behind in the delegate count and is alienating a large section of the party by running a negative campaign. You can tell to some degree by the fact that no super delegates have announced for her since Super Duper Tuesday but Senator Obama has picked up a decent number of superdelegate endorsements including a couple this week.
Capitalist
03-07-2008, 03:44 PM
If you look at the polling results clinton needs Senator Obama on the ticket or risks losing a large number of voters and states. Senator Obama does not need Senator Clinton on the ticket because most of her voters will go democratic anyway except for some Lieberman types. That is why she is the one floating the concept of a clinton/obama ticket. Again, she has not dealt with the fact that she is behind in the delegate count and is alienating a large section of the party by running a negative campaign. You can tell to some degree by the fact that no super delegates have announced for her since Super Duper Tuesday but Senator Obama has picked up a decent number of superdelegate endorsements including a couple this week.
Obama's problem is that a group who does not normally vote is coming out big for Clinton.
Young single women normally vote is very small number, usually sitting it out. They are VERY motivated by a woman running. Many will not turn out if Clinton is not on the ticket.
Yellowdogtexan
03-07-2008, 03:45 PM
Sarah Powers has resigned from the Obama campaign due to the fallout on these remarks.
This calls for some satire from Andy Borowitz Calling Hillary a Monster ‘Offensive,’ Monsters Say
Prominent Miscreants Outraged Over Remark
An Obama campaign aide’s remarks in which she called Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) a “monster” have ignited a firestorm of controversy among monsters across the U.S., prominent monsters confirmed today.
Calling Hillary Clinton a monster is “odious and offensive to monsters everywhere,” said Tracy Klujian, the executive director of the Monster Anti-Defamation League, a group that monitors unflattering portrayals of monsters and miscreants in the media.
“As monsters, we are subject to defamation and stereotyping on a daily basis,” Mr. Klujian said. “But being lumped together with Hillary Clinton is really a low blow.”
Mr. Klujian said that he was pleased that the Obama aide had resigned over the “monster” remark, but said that more “more work will need to be done” if the Illinois senator is to mend fences with the monster community.
“We monsters count for as much as five percent of the vote in Pennsylvania,” Mr. Klujian said. “And that number is even higher in Pittsburgh.”
Perhaps in an effort to steer clear of the controversy, Sen. Clinton herself dodged the issue of whether or not Sen. Obama is a monster in an upcoming interview on “Sixty Minutes.”
“He’s not a monster as far as I know,” she told Steve Kroft in an interview to air this Sunday. “I mean, I take him on the basis of what he says, and, you know, if he says he’s not a monster, there isn’t any reason to doubt that.”
Elsewhere, Rep. Ron Paul said that he is dropping out of the G.O.P. race, but would continue to run for president of Earth II.
Trueblue
03-07-2008, 05:18 PM
That would be the in Top 3 most idiotic, Un American, Criminal Tickets in our History, led by:
Bush-Cheney
Bush-Quayle
Reagan-Bush
I think I see a trend here!
Ike ticket was offset by the stupid, yet dishonest, Nixon.
God what a sickening thought:wall:yuck:yuck:butt
Capitalist
03-07-2008, 05:21 PM
Sarah Powers has resigned from the Obama campaign due to the fallout on these remarks.
This calls for some satire from Andy Borowitz
And my mother told me you never get in trouble for telling the truth. So much for that myth.
In the political world it seems the truth must always be avoided even when EVERYONE knows it is true.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.