Fanatical? Oh ya.....

[Wabash]

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080228105322.ylw1j5ia&show_article=1

Kind of reminds me of Hitler....

[Ringo]

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080228105322.ylw1j5ia&show_article=1

Kind of reminds me of Hitler....

Does Monkey Boy:monkey even realize what just a couple of Carriers, could do to his stinkhole in the desert?
Good greif I spect Russia & China might question the Lonneytunes too, or Israel, Britian, and France??

What a damned DUFUS or a typical Muslim Moron!!!:godzilla:godzilla:godzilla

[April15]

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080228105322.ylw1j5ia&show_article=1

Kind of reminds me of Hitler....Hitler was crazy this guy is just stupid!

[Cookie Parker]

Does Monkey Boy:monkey even realize what just a couple of Carriers, could do to his stinkhole in the desert?
Good greif I spect Russia & China might question the Lonneytunes too, or Israel, Britian, and France??

What a damned DUFUS or a typical Muslim Moron!!!:godzilla:godzilla:godzilla

I don't think so....less than competent bush has given this man more power than he had before...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/aug/23/iran.syria

The US-led "war on terror" has bolstered Iran's power and influence in the Middle East, especially over its neighbour and former enemy Iraq, a thinktank said today.

A report published by Chatham House said the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had removed Iran's main rival regimes in the region.

Israel's conflict with the Palestinians and its invasion of Lebanon had also put Iran "in a position of considerable strength" in the Middle East, said the thinktank.

Unless stability could be restored to the region, Iran's power will continue to grow, according to the report published by Chatham House

The study said Iran had been swift to fill the political vacuum created by the removal of the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The Islamic republic now has a level of influence in the region that could not be ignored.

In particular, Iran has now superseded the US as the most influential power in Iraq, regarding its former adversary as its "own backyard". It is also a "prominent presence" in its other war-torn neighbour, Afghanistan, according to Chatham House's analysts.

The report said: "There is little doubt that Iran has been the chief beneficiary of the war on terror in the Middle East.

"The United States, with coalition support, has eliminated two of Iran's regional rival governments - the Taliban in Afghanistan in November 2001 and Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq in April 2003 - but has failed to replace either with coherent and stable political structures."

The thinktank said the west needed to understand better Iran's links with its neighbours to see why the country felt able "to resist Western pressure".

"The US-driven agenda for confronting Iran is severely compromised by the confident ease with which Iran sits in its region," said the report.

Western countries, led by the US, are locked in a bitter dispute with Iran over its nuclear programme.

Iran, the world's fourth largest oil exporter, says it will not give up what it says is its right to peaceful nuclear technology. The west suspects Tehran is developing nuclear weapons.

The thinktank said: "While the US and Europeans slowly grind the nuclear issue through the mills of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the United Nations security council, Iran continues to prevaricate, feeling confident of victory as conditions turn ever more in its favour."

The report added the country was "simply too important - for political, economic, cultural, religions and military reasons - to be treated lightly".

I'd say the boy is right...after all, this nation toppled the US backed Shah and put into power their religious leader.and the US has been unable to get back inside since.

A huge defense debt does not a powerful nation make...

[Wabash]

I don't think so....less than competent bush has given this man more power than he had before...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/aug/23/iran.syria



I'd say the boy is right...after all, this nation toppled the US backed Shah and put into power their religious leader.and the US has been unable to get back inside since.

A huge defense debt does not a powerful nation make...

We can still obliterate them in short order...

[Cookie Parker]

We can still obliterate them in short order...

Absolutely...nothing stops us from having the worse dictator wannabe Napolean ruler on the planet.

However, I don't think we could actually "conquer" them. I mean, come on. If we can't win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, how on earth can we obliterate a nation in the middle east which is liked by most arab nations who are tired of the US running rough shod over their countries?

[Wabash]

Absolutely...nothing stops us from having the worse dictator wannabe Napolean ruler on the planet.

However, I don't think we could actually "conquer" them. I mean, come on. If we can't win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, how on earth can we obliterate a nation in the middle east which is liked by most arab nations who are tired of the US running rough shod over their countries?

You have a point. However, the way the world is going....we will have to fight em sooner or later...I'd prefer sooner...before they get any stronger or techno savvy...

[issac the dragon]

I am deeply troubled by people who cannot find any solution to any problem except killing everyone. That is utter and complete failure.

[Cookie Parker]

I am deeply troubled by people who cannot find any solution to any problem except killing everyone. That is utter and complete failure.


Not to mention the mind of a terrorist. I agree. We don't get along, we explode people and kill them and call for their killing....how many times have you heard a republican say that democrats are best taken out and shot? And we're all americans.

Fear and hate sell..and this administration has done a great job, well since REagan, really, there has been a great job of putting fear in this nation and a "we must get them before they get us"...threat.

[patriotsblade]

we will have to fight em sooner or later...I'd prefer sooner

We do? You mean like we had to fight the Soviets Union? Oh that's right...we didn't, we spent years engaged in diplomacy until their lousy form of goverment petered out. Ronald Reagan actually talked to (even wrote personal letters to) our #1 enemy in the world. One that was a much greater threat then, than Iran is now, and that's when we had a military twice as big as now. Surely we didn't need to 'talk' to them, did we? I mean they had no sense of self-preservation, did they?

Wabby, you should first understand the Ahmadinejad does not control Iran. The Mullahs do. He is their little puppet. These Mullahs lead a very comfy little lives, they do not want their boat rocked. If you want to know why we are getting all this vociferous banter from Iran put yourself in their position for a minute.

They have the armed forces of a country that has literally called them 'evil' occupying another country they deemed 'evil' on their border. They are flexing the only muscle of deterrent they think they have.

[Ringo]

Absolutely...nothing stops us from having the worse dictator wannabe Napolean ruler on the planet.

However, I don't think we could actually "conquer" them. I mean, come on. If we can't win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, how on earth can we obliterate a nation in the middle east which is liked by most arab nations who are tired of the US running rough shod over their countries?

Do you do conjugal visits at Guantanamo?? I get different reports than you do on the Iraqi people, of course mine come from peoples of Freedom and Peace seekers, whearas yours come from Al Jareez or CNN!!!:sheep:pblade:aliens

[Wabash]

We do? You mean like we had to fight the Soviets Union? Oh that's right...we didn't, we spent years engaged in diplomacy until their lousy form of goverment petered out. Ronald Reagan actually talked to (even wrote personal letters to) our #1 enemy in the world. One that was a much greater threat then, than Iran is now, and that's when we had a military twice as big as now. Surely we didn't need to 'talk' to them, did we? I mean they had no sense of self-preservation, did they?

Wabby, you should first understand the Ahmadinejad does not control Iran. The Mullahs do. He is their little puppet. These Mullahs lead a very comfy little lives, they do not want their boat rocked. If you want to know why we are getting all this vociferous banter from Iran put yourself in their position for a minute.

They have the armed forces of a country that has literally called them 'evil' occupying another country they deemed 'evil' on their border. They are flexing the only muscle of deterrent they think they have.
Yes they are....so do you laugh it off, or take it seriously?

Do you do conjugal visits at Guantanamo?? I get different reports than you do on the Iraqi people, of course mine come from peoples of Freedom and Peace seekers, whearas yours come from Al Jareez or CNN!!!:sheep:pblade:aliens
Yep!