Yellowdogtexan
02-24-2008, 07:49 PM
This should be fun to watch http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/24/democrats_plan_to_complain_to.html?hpid=topnewsThe Democratic National Committee will file a complaint Monday with the Federal Election Commission, alleging that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has illegally blown through spending limits imposed by the presidential public financing system.
"This is a classic example of someone who talks one way and does the other," DNC Chairman Howard Dean said today. "Our purpose here is to get him to obey the law."
Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, replied that Dean lacked credibility on the issue, while McCain spokesman Brian Rogers noted that Dean withdrew from the public financing system during his bid for president four years ago.
"Howard Dean's hypocrisy is breathtaking, given that in 2003 he withdrew from the matching funds system in exactly the same way that John McCain is doing today," he said.
The complaint is based on a dispute between McCain, who appears headed toward his party's nomination for president, and the FEC, which notified him last week that it had not approved his request to withdraw from the public funding system.
McCain had applied for public funds last year when his campaign was running on fumes. After he won a series of early primaries, he requested to withdraw from the system. The FEC typically permits candidates to withdraw if they have not spent any of the public matching funds, or have not used the promise of federal money to obtain a loan.
The DNC plans to argue that McCain did obtain a loan based on the promise of repaying it with federal funds, party attorney Joe Sandler said. The Democrats also plan to claim that McCain cannot withdraw from the public financing system without the FEC taking up the matter; the commission made that contention itself in its letter to McCain. The FEC has been unable to consider McCain's request because it lacks a quorum. (Congress is deadlocked over the confirmation of four appointees to the six-member commission.)
McCain's advisers have so far brushed off the FEC's concerns, noting that the lack of a quorum means the FEC chairman's letter carries no weight. But the Democrats' complaint could increase the pressure on McCain to respond to the matter.
If McCain is forced to remain in the federal funding program, it could prove an extremely unwelcome development for him. He would be limited to spending $54 million during the primary season, which ends at the Republican Party convention in September. He had already spent $49 million by the end of January.
One key difference between Dean's experience and McCain's is the unresolved question of whether McCain used the promise of federal money to secure $1 million just before heading into the key early primaries.
"The McCain campaign has incorrectly stated that McCain is doing what Dean did when he withdrew from public financing in his presidential bid, but they have the facts wrong," a DNC spokesman said in a statement. "Dean did not use the promise of matching funds as collateral for a loan. Dean withdrew before the FEC determined eligibility for funds, unlike McCain. And he spent millions of dollars to get his name on the ballot after withdrawing, unlike McCain, who had free ballot access in many states because he pledged to accept matching funds."McCain agreed to accept matching funds to get on the ballot in a number of states and now is claiming that he is not bound by the FEC spending limits.
If nothing else, the bushies are going to have to relent and give up on the concept of having a voter suppression attorney on the FEC. The only way for McCain to comply with the requirements is for the FEC to have a quorom which means that the bushies and the republicans in congress are going to have to back down or see McCain go to jail during the campaign
"This is a classic example of someone who talks one way and does the other," DNC Chairman Howard Dean said today. "Our purpose here is to get him to obey the law."
Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, replied that Dean lacked credibility on the issue, while McCain spokesman Brian Rogers noted that Dean withdrew from the public financing system during his bid for president four years ago.
"Howard Dean's hypocrisy is breathtaking, given that in 2003 he withdrew from the matching funds system in exactly the same way that John McCain is doing today," he said.
The complaint is based on a dispute between McCain, who appears headed toward his party's nomination for president, and the FEC, which notified him last week that it had not approved his request to withdraw from the public funding system.
McCain had applied for public funds last year when his campaign was running on fumes. After he won a series of early primaries, he requested to withdraw from the system. The FEC typically permits candidates to withdraw if they have not spent any of the public matching funds, or have not used the promise of federal money to obtain a loan.
The DNC plans to argue that McCain did obtain a loan based on the promise of repaying it with federal funds, party attorney Joe Sandler said. The Democrats also plan to claim that McCain cannot withdraw from the public financing system without the FEC taking up the matter; the commission made that contention itself in its letter to McCain. The FEC has been unable to consider McCain's request because it lacks a quorum. (Congress is deadlocked over the confirmation of four appointees to the six-member commission.)
McCain's advisers have so far brushed off the FEC's concerns, noting that the lack of a quorum means the FEC chairman's letter carries no weight. But the Democrats' complaint could increase the pressure on McCain to respond to the matter.
If McCain is forced to remain in the federal funding program, it could prove an extremely unwelcome development for him. He would be limited to spending $54 million during the primary season, which ends at the Republican Party convention in September. He had already spent $49 million by the end of January.
One key difference between Dean's experience and McCain's is the unresolved question of whether McCain used the promise of federal money to secure $1 million just before heading into the key early primaries.
"The McCain campaign has incorrectly stated that McCain is doing what Dean did when he withdrew from public financing in his presidential bid, but they have the facts wrong," a DNC spokesman said in a statement. "Dean did not use the promise of matching funds as collateral for a loan. Dean withdrew before the FEC determined eligibility for funds, unlike McCain. And he spent millions of dollars to get his name on the ballot after withdrawing, unlike McCain, who had free ballot access in many states because he pledged to accept matching funds."McCain agreed to accept matching funds to get on the ballot in a number of states and now is claiming that he is not bound by the FEC spending limits.
If nothing else, the bushies are going to have to relent and give up on the concept of having a voter suppression attorney on the FEC. The only way for McCain to comply with the requirements is for the FEC to have a quorom which means that the bushies and the republicans in congress are going to have to back down or see McCain go to jail during the campaign