Clinton is over

[Wabash]

Thursday, February 21, 2008
Capitalism Kills Clinton - Socialism Wins Out

Dick McDonald

Barack won Wisconsin and went "Berserk". His victory speech after his win
was straight out of the "Communist Manifesto". Barack is not dumb, just
drunk with his new found power and the realization that catering to the
whims of our liberally-indoctrinated anti-capitalist young Americans was as
intoxicating to him as it was to them - they screeched and yelled at every
"taking" of the property of the rich as if Jesus Christ had returned and was
leveling the playing field with loaves of money.

And boy did he play that crowd for every emotional populist trick man has
ever used - he won the day and the election because Hillary incorrectly
calculated that Democrats were somewhat rational and would embrace some
vestiges of capitalism - she failed - she's as dead as two-week old salmon.
Everyone abandoned her like they will abandon Republicans for one simple
reason - Obama understands and is playing the "income disparity card" and
the discontent that over 100 million Americans "feel" about being left out
of the American Dream.

Obama's speech proved one thing - the "creeping socialism" real Americans
are worried about just turned into a full gallop with a very charismatic
young leader steeped in far-left dogma and a voting record to prove it. The
man is a civil-rights attorney who is nothing more than the social worker he
was in his early days after law school - but he learned those lessons well
and has taken speech lessons.

The man knows how to work the "street" and he has made fools of normally
rational American citizens. He has successfully endorsed socialism as the
economic tool to deliver the American Dream. His speech proved how
disconnected the American people can be from reality. Taxing the rich has
never nor will it ever make the poor rich. It will never close the income
disparity gap. Russia's 70-year experience with communism proved that - yet
here was Barack selling that old discredited tune to those too young to
remember the Soviet Union and its implosion - and remember that that part of
history has been rewritten by the modern-day liberal teachers who still
advocate socialism over capitalism.

And if a charlatan can feint right while going left who knows what mischief
he can visit on America believing in that failed philosophy. Obama's speech
was the ax chopping down the tree of capitalism one huge chip with every
swing. What Americans are missing is that Obama is mining the heartstrings
while stealing from the wallet of the productive by taking their property
and redistributing it to the unproductive. That never works except to buy
votes and if his popularity is any measure, he will be coroneted in November
as the last great hope of mankind.

What has really happened is that the American people are so deceived by a
propaganda driven left-wing media they have no support for the reality of
the exceptionalism that is America. They can be led to believe in any
fiction they are fed. Today they are being fed the nonsense that spending
money to solve a problem actually will solve it. Everyone should know by now
that you have to build the product before you sell it. Democrats have fed us
the pap that they can skip that step and go straight to the "confiscation of
wealth" method. Apparently Hillary missed that memo and as a result - she is
toast.

Clinton Is Over...

http://dickmcdonald.blogspot.com/

[Trueblue]

Wow, Dick is the right name for that guy.

If the numbers of the two candidates were reversed, he would have made the same claims about Hillary.

As for the idea that the USSR's/Russia's problems were simply taxing the rich to give to the poor-:rofl Read a history book, DICK.

An oligarchy is every bit as threatening to our way of life as a communist regime.

[Saguaro]

:lmao :lmao :lmao That OP piece

[Wabash]

Wow, Dick is the right name for that guy.

If the numbers of the two candidates were reversed, he would have made the same claims about Hillary.

As for the idea that the USSR's/Russia's problems were simply taxing the rich to give to the poor-:rofl Read a history book, DICK.

An oligarchy is every bit as threatening to our way of life as a communist regime.

:lmao :lmao :lmao That OP piece

I don't thing you two really see the dangerous ramifications ahead..... keep listening to the Magical Mouth...he is no different than any other liberal that wants massive protective govt. to control all our lives...THAT is the new idea that they are peddling!

[Trueblue]

What are you talking about? Specifically, what "massive protection"????

[issac the dragon]

I wouldn't panic just yet. We still have a second and third branch of government. The POTUS isn't a dictator, and Obama can only do as much as he is allowed to do.

The problem with Bush is that for six years the Republicans "allowed" him to do whatever he wanted. That is not usually a problem for Democrats because they disagree with each other too much to get a lot done. And that is good for the country sometimes.

[Trueblue]

That's how many of us have felt for several years-like bye, bye, America. 1/20/09!

[April15]

Isssac you put too much faith in the "stacked " other branches of government. One thing the last 7 years has shown me is that the mafia has nothing on Bush for "keep your mouth shut" way of doing things. The simple fact that he has used executive privilege to stop short investigations of wrong doing by HIM says a lot about whom the bell tolls for!

[issac the dragon]

You are right April. And now that has become the way the POTUS will always function. No president has ever given up authority. We will be suffering from Bush for many years.

[toxic]

... Obama understands and is playing the "income disparity card" and the discontent that over 100 million Americans "feel" about being left out of the American Dream.
...
Taxing the rich has never nor will it ever make the poor rich. It will never close the income disparity gap.
...
Everyone should know by now that you have to build the product before you sell it. Democrats have fed us the pap that they can skip that step and go straight to the "confiscation of wealth" method....


100 million Americans have finally realized that they are getting screwed in the ass at the expense of the wealthiest Americans? Voting their best interests is called "Democracy".

Tax breaks for the rich have never helped the poor either.

No products are being built in America-period. Republicans have shipped all the manufacturing to China.

[nixon]

I don't thing you two really see the dangerous ramifications ahead..... keep listening to the Magical Mouth...he is no different than any other liberal that wants massive protective govt. to control all our lives...THAT is the new idea that they are peddling!Wabs, That is what we have right now. How come you don't see it when it is the Republican's agenda? Less government? Look at what the GOP did when Terry Shiavo's husband wanted to take her off life support. A massive protective government to control all our lives....Look at it as it really is, my Brother. Nixon.

[Ringo]

Wabs, That is what we have right now. How come you don't see it when it is the Republican's agenda? Less government? Look at what the GOP did when Terry Shiavo's husband wanted to take her off life support. A massive protective government to control all our lives....Look at it as it really is, my Brother. Nixon.

Shaivo's husband was a PRICK who was after the MONEY, and he FEARED her waking up for some reason!! He reminded me of many Liberal pussies who act this way...Clinton-Kennedy-"others"

I watched Clinton FIX nothing, LBJ was a fucking bumb, Carter was an idiot, so why are you sheep cheering for Burrhead??

[nixon]

Shaivo's husband was a PRICK who was after the MONEY, and he FEARED her waking up for some reason!! He reminded me of many Liberal pussies who act this way...Clinton-Kennedy-"others"

I watched Clinton FIX nothing, LBJ was a fucking bumb, Carter was an idiot, so why are you sheep cheering for Burrhead??Even if her husband was after the money, which is a different story, the real issue is the Republican President, Republican Congress and Republican Gov. of Florida couldn't keep their noses out of what wasn't their business. There were laws already on the books to deal with the issue at hand. Smaller government my ass. You'll never convince me that the GOP stands for small government, maybe at one time it did, but not anymore. They want to listen in on my phone conversations. How can you justify any of this? Get a clue, Dude.

[patriotsblade]

Shaivo's husband was a PRICK who was after the MONEY, and he FEARED her waking up for some reason!! He reminded me of many Liberal pussies who act this way...Clinton-Kennedy-"others"

I watched Clinton FIX nothing, LBJ was a fucking bumb, Carter was an idiot, so why are you sheep cheering for Burrhead??

Hey Ringo, who is burrhead, and what does that name mean?

[nixon]

Hey Ringo, who is burrhead, and what does that name mean?Ringo does not address the issue well, does he? "Her husband was a prick". O.K., Ringo, You're right, her husband was a prick. I never met the man, so I don't know if I can agree with you on that, but for an arguement's sake I'll say he was a prick. Back to the real issue, the Republican Party does not stand for small government. The GOP has lost its' way.

[Yellowdogtexan]

Shaivo's husband was a PRICK who was after the MONEY, and he FEARED her waking up for some reasonWhat a stupid post. This is up there with ringo's fantasies about Vince Foster, Waco and campaign contributions from china. In the real world, these claims were investigated by adults and dismissed. Here a cout appointed a guardian ad litem to protect the interest of Terri Schiavo and that guardian and the court approved that actions taken. Again ringo makes silly claims that are simply stupid that do not hold up in the real world.

[April15]

The best part was Trent Lott declaring from a video that she was not brain dead. Now that man needs his medical license revoked!

[Wabash]

Wabs, That is what we have right now. How come you don't see it when it is the Republican's agenda? Less government? Look at what the GOP did when Terry Shiavo's husband wanted to take her off life support. A massive protective government to control all our lives....Look at it as it really is, my Brother. Nixon.
I know nix...I'm just pointing out that obama Rama or hillary are not gonna be any different, and probably worse!

Hey Ringo, who is burrhead, and what does that name mean?

:tv

[Lone Laugher]

Wabby, many of us have stated that we were willing to give W a chance back in 2000.....and we did rally behind him in the aftermath of 9-11. He let us down on all counts.

Now, you may have an opportunity to demonstrate that you too will give a POTUS that you don't support a chance.

You know and I know that none of the candidtates are socialists. Advocating an end to tax benefits for very wealthy people and an end to tax benefits and other corporate subsidies ( especially for corporations that have shifted manufacturing jobs overseas ) may constitute wealth distribution...but it is not suggesting state ownership of the means of production.

Nixon is right when he states that the current administration has grown government to new levels and has demonstrated a desire to delve into our private affairs...from Schiavo to gay marriage amendments to eavesdropping to wardrobe malfunctions.

Dubya has led an economy that has seen the stagnation in the growth in real wages and increases in the cost of necessities ( fuel, food, medical care, higher education ) that have made life much more difficult for the vast majority of Americans. When W took office, the debt and deficit were under control and shrinking....you know what is happening now. I have worked very hard to make sure that my family has no debt. Now, I am the not-so-proud owner of about $150,000 worth of our national debt ( figured at $30,000 per individual ).

Our foreign policy? Unmitigated disaster that requires no debate.

You may not feel that Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton...or even John McCain are the right persons for the job...but you simply must admit that we are in need of a new approach.

You have stated many times that you are financially secure and have no fears regarding your personal well-being...regardless of who the POTUS is. That must be a great feeling. Congratulations. There are many who do not have such confidence. The ground is awfully shaky for most Americans.

Is it too much to ask that you at least give the new POTUS an opportunity to fuck up? It really cannot---realistically--get any worse.

[Matt]

Y'all have done such a magnificent job of addressing the fallacies in the opening link and the ultra right wing responses that there is nothing left to say except
:cheers :yay :paclap :paclap


:D

[nixon]

I know nix...I'm just pointing out that obama Rama or hillary are not gonna be any different, and probably worse!



:tvThey will "Probably" be worse..... Maybe and maybe they won't be. Right now as it stands, I beleive the Democrats are showing more concern for my civil liberties than the Republicans are, wouldn't you agree? With that in mind, why would anyone vote for a Republican if less government intrusion were the issue? The PATRIOT Act is anything but patriotic. That got passed with a Republican President and Congress. It just gives me another time I get to ask, "A smaller government?". My ass.
Nixon.

[Wabash]

Wabby, many of us have stated that we were willing to give W a chance back in 2000.....and we did rally behind him in the aftermath of 9-11. He let us down on all counts.

Now, you may have an opportunity to demonstrate that you too will give a POTUS that you don't support a chance.

You know and I know that none of the candidtates are socialists. Advocating an end to tax benefits for very wealthy people and an end to tax benefits and other corporate subsidies ( especially for corporations that have shifted manufacturing jobs overseas ) may constitute wealth distribution...but it is not suggesting state ownership of the means of production.

Nixon is right when he states that the current administration has grown government to new levels and has demonstrated a desire to delve into our private affairs...from Schiavo to gay marriage amendments to eavesdropping to wardrobe malfunctions.

Dubya has led an economy that has seen the stagnation in the growth in real wages and increases in the cost of necessities ( fuel, food, medical care, higher education ) that have made life much more difficult for the vast majority of Americans. When W took office, the debt and deficit were under control and shrinking....you know what is happening now. I have worked very hard to make sure that my family has no debt. Now, I am the not-so-proud owner of about $150,000 worth of our national debt ( figured at $30,000 per individual ).

Our foreign policy? Unmitigated disaster that requires no debate.

You may not feel that Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton...or even John McCain are the right persons for the job...but you simply must admit that we are in need of a new approach.

You have stated many times that you are financially secure and have no fears regarding your personal well-being...regardless of who the POTUS is. That must be a great feeling. Congratulations. There are many who do not have such confidence. The ground is awfully shaky for most Americans.

Is it too much to ask that you at least give the new POTUS an opportunity to fuck up? It really cannot---realistically--get any worse.
Very well thought out post! I do agree for the most part, but can we afford 4 years of a socialist? That's the only point I really disagree on...Hill and Obbie are both socialists!

They will "Probably" be worse..... Maybe and maybe they won't be. Right now as it stands, I beleive the Democrats are showing more concern for my civil liberties than the Republicans are, wouldn't you agree? With that in mind, why would anyone vote for a Republican if less government intrusion were the issue? The PATRIOT Act is anything but patriotic. That got passed with a Republican President and Congress. It just gives me another time I get to ask, "A smaller government?". My ass.
Nixon.
Well, Bush has failed on the economic front for sure...I'm for smaller govt. I'm for Ronnie...but, sadly, Ronnie was one of a kind!

[nixon]

Very well thought out post! I do agree for the most part, but can we afford 4 years of a socialist? That's the only point I really disagree on...Hill and Obbie are both socialists!


Well, Bush has failed on the economic front for sure...I'm for smaller govt. I'm for Ronnie...but, sadly, Ronnie was one of a kind!Ronnie was 25 years ago, alot has changed since then. Republicans had their chance, Wabs, and the Bush/Cheney team blew it. And that's all I got to say about that.