PDA

View Full Version : Bush budget sees bigger deficits as economy slows


Saguaro
02-04-2008, 10:07 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush acknowledged on Monday a weaker economy would lead to higher budget deficits, as he unveiled a $3.1 trillion spending plan for fiscal year 2009 that would nearly freeze domestic programs.

The budget makes military spending and the Iraq war its centerpiece, proposing a 7.5 percent increase for the Pentagon to $515 billion. On top of that Bush also sought $70 billion more for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In an outlook that Democrats said may even understate the extent of the fiscal woes, Bush forecast a deficit of $410 billion for the budget year 2008 that ends on September 30 and $407 billion for fiscal 2009 that begins on October 1.

Those deficits are more than double the $162 billion gap of 2007 and will approach the $413 billion all-time high for the deficit hit in 2004.

The grimmer budget situation will be inherited by the next president, who succeeds Bush in January 2009.

While many -- if not most -- of the priorities of the Bush budget will be jettisoned by the Democratic-led U.S. Congress, the unveiling of the document is sure to trigger a new round of sparring over Bush's fiscal policies and his economic legacy.

With the economy possibly teetering on the brink of a recession, revenues are expected to suffer, reversing a trend of the past three years in which annual deficits declined.

A promised $150 billion stimulus package of tax rebates will add to the deficit, at least in the short term, and funding for the Iraq war is another source of red ink.

"The primary reason for increasing deficits in the near term is the president's economic growth package and an expected slowing of receipt growth, due to an expected reduction in corporate tax receipts from recent high levels," said Bush's budget sent to Congress.

Some critics say the actual budget deficits could be even higher, noting that the economic predictions used to calculate the Bush budget are rosier than private-sector forecasts and that the spending plan includes only a portion of the expected funding needs for the Iraq war in 2009.

As details of the budget began to leak out over the weekend, Democrats hammered Bush for presiding over a shift to deficits after taking office amid budget surpluses.

"Today's budget bears all the hallmarks of the Bush legacy -- it leads to more deficits, more debt, more tax cuts, more cutbacks in critical services," said House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, a South Carolina Democrat.

In addition to freezing scores of programs, Bush proposed cutting some 22 percent of the funding for the program that helps poor families pay to heat their homes as well as reduces aid for Amtrak passenger rail service by almost 34 percent.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080204/pl_nm/bush_budget_dc_6;_ylt=AkH6wVuekVnnCfz0UbnLhikGw_IE

patriotsblade
02-04-2008, 11:44 AM
http://www.dems.gov/index.asp?Type=B_PR&SEC=%7BD68CD0B2-1442-4804-9F6B-AF67DE7FF585%7D&DE=%7BFDD09C4F-E958-4E13-A92B-179C2FAC6FEA%7D&Design=PrintView

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/rchart4.gif

issac the dragon
02-04-2008, 12:00 PM
Perhaps the Nicaraguans can help the people with their heating bills again. I don't think it embarasses Bush to have another country give financial aid to us. It ought to, but it doesn't. In fact, some of his supporters think that people in this country should refuse to take the money.

I heard yesterday that 50% of the American people have been in a recession for the last few years. With static wages, or wages that in reality have been declining. The other half, is doing okay.

People who depend on SSI are doing very badly. Their income goes up 2.3% and their Medicare payment goes up higher than that. Before they ever see a cent, they are behind. And we all know there is no inflation. The government says so. Of course, they don't count the price of food, gas, or utilities. Just the cost of Blueberrys.

nixon
02-04-2008, 12:10 PM
He's almost gone.

Saguaro
02-04-2008, 08:10 PM
Budget highlights
DEFICITS: The plan will claim deficits in the $400 billion range for this year and next

DEFENSE: The Pentagon would get a $35 billion increase to $515 billion for core programs, about 7 percent, with war costs additional

MEDICARE AND MEDICAID: The programs will see almost $200 billion in cuts over the next five years, about three times the savings proposed last year but rejected by Congress

HEALTH: Health and Human Services Department funding would be cut by $2 billion, amounting to a 3 percent reduction

HOMELAND SECURITY: Overall, the budget for homeland security programs will increase by almost 11 percent

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/04/bush.budget.ap/index.html#cnnSTCText

Trueblue
02-04-2008, 08:13 PM
Why are there more uninsured than seven years ago? Higher unemployment, or are more companies dumping insurance?

jim
02-04-2008, 10:10 PM
Why are there more uninsured than seven years ago? Higher unemployment, or are more companies dumping insurance?


Because it was allowed - if not - indeed, encouraged:godzilla:brr

Lone Laugher
02-05-2008, 07:04 AM
Why are there more uninsured than seven years ago? Higher unemployment, or are more companies dumping insurance?

I can answer that from a personal standpoint.

My employer used to cover 100% of the cost to insure my family. Beginning this year, the policy changed to cover just me. This left my wife and three children uninsured. Due to a pre-existing condition, my wife was denied coverage by BC/BS....and is currently uninsured.

She has had to cancel two appointments with her doctor already. We were able to get a temporary policy for her. All we can hope for is that some insurance company will approve her with the pre-existing.

So...far from being a charity case....we have added to the ranks of the uninsured. Ain't life grand!

Trueblue
02-05-2008, 07:08 AM
Good luck to you in finding insurance. This can happen to just about anybody.

jim
02-05-2008, 07:26 AM
Good luck to you in finding insurance. This can happen to just about anybody.

Yes, it can!!! And it shouldn't!!:godzilla

nixon
02-05-2008, 07:32 AM
I can answer that from a personal standpoint.

My employer used to cover 100% of the cost to insure my family. Beginning this year, the policy changed to cover just me. This left my wife and three children uninsured. Due to a pre-existing condition, my wife was denied coverage by BC/BS....and is currently uninsured.

She has had to cancel two appointments with her doctor already. We were able to get a temporary policy for her. All we can hope for is that some insurance company will approve her with the pre-existing.

So...far from being a charity case....we have added to the ranks of the uninsured. Ain't life grand!How can this happen to hard working Americans? Let me expand on this; I had my left hip replaced. The cost was138 thousand because the surgery had to be done twice. (Altough I don't know this for a fact, I beleive the wrong size prostetic was initially installed.) I had insurance, however, my insurance company's contract price for a hip replacement was 60,000. So guess who owed the hospital the balance? Please tell me how there isn't anything wrong with our current system. Nixon.