PDA

View Full Version : Rice Says Iran 'Lying' About Nukes


Wabash
10-12-2007, 01:58 AM
Oct 11, 6:08 PM (ET)

By MATTHEW LEE


SHANNON, Ireland (AP) - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Thursday accused Iran of "lying" about the aim of its nuclear program, saying there's no doubt Tehran wants the capability to produce nuclear weapons and has deceived the U.N.'s atomic watchdog about its intentions.

"There is an Iranian history of obfuscation and, indeed, lying to the IAEA," she said, referring to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

"There is a history of Iran not answering important questions about what is going on and there is Iran pursuing nuclear technologies that can lead to nuclear weapons-grade material," Rice told reporters aboard her plane as she headed to Moscow.

U.S. officials have long accused Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons behind the facade of a civil atomic energy program, charges that Tehran denies. But Rice's strong words, including the blunt reference to Iranian "lying," come at a critical time in dealing with the matter.

The United States is trying to win Russian support for new U.N. sanctions against Iran but has faced sharp resistance from Moscow, which has nuclear cooperation agreements with Tehran and argues the country should be given more time to come clean on its programs.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said this week there is no proof Tehran is trying to build the bomb. Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates are scheduled to see him in Moscow on Friday.

Washington has been pressing for more sanctions since earlier this year.

But last month, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council - Britain, China, France the United States and Russia - and Germany agreed with the support of the European Union to hold off on a new sanctions resolution until November to allow negotiations with Iran to continue.

If no progress is made on two separate tracks - talks with E.U. foreign policy chief Javier Solana on an offer of assistance in exchange for a suspension in Iran's nuclear program and discussions with IAEA on its past activities - they are to bring the resolution to a vote.

It remains unclear, though, if Russia and China, which also opposes sanctions, will support it.

Even as work on the proposed resolution is to continue at an Oct. 17 meeting of senior diplomats in Europe, Putin said Wednesday that Russia was not convinced Iran is trying to create nuclear weapons.

His comments came after talks with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, whose government is firmly behind the U.S. sanctions drive, and appeared to deal a new blow to efforts to forge a consensus.

"We have no objective data that Iran is seeking to make atomic weapons," Putin said. "Therefore, we proceed from the assumption that Iran has no such plans."

Rice, however, stressed that Russia had signed on to the Sept. 28 agreement to consider new sanctions in November and said she did not "expect that there is any deviation from that course at this point" from the Russian side.

She also noted that Russia had in the past demonstrated its concern about Iran's program by limiting its cooperation to prevent Tehran from acquiring a full nuclear fuel cycle that could be used to produce weapons-grade material.

"That concern was seen very clearly in Russia's offer to Iran to enrich and reprocess in a joint venture and to bring back any spent fuel so that the fuel cycle wouldn't be available to Iran," she said. "I think there is a reason for that and that is suspicion about Iran's intentions."
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20071011/D8S79UHO0.html

Wabash
10-12-2007, 01:59 AM
It's not just Bush Adm. who thinks this is going on...obviously if ALL these countries are in agreement on some action....SOMETHING ain't kosher!

Wabash
10-12-2007, 02:03 AM
It's not just Bush Adm. who thinks this is going on...obviously if ALL these countries are in agreement on some action....SOMETHING ain't kosher!

It appears to me that Rice and Cheney are on the same page....:ohyeah

Yellowdogtexan
10-12-2007, 06:54 AM
rice made the same claims about Iraq. I trust the IAEA here and do not trust anything from the bushies. It is sad to have leaders in govt. who can not be trusted to tell the truth

Wabash
10-12-2007, 12:19 PM
rice made the same claims about Iraq. I trust the IAEA here and do not trust anything from the bushies. It is sad to have leaders in govt. who can not be trusted to tell the truth

Yep...Bill Clinton comes to mind everytime!

Kurtz
10-12-2007, 12:29 PM
Yep...Bill Clinton comes to mind everytime!

Hey YDT, have you heard this before??! :lmao

It's ALL Bill Clinton's fault. :lmao


Some things just never change. :lmao

I believe I'll post a youtube here so SOME folks will get it!
And others can go back to thinkin' Kurtz is crazeee! :lmao

Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X155ZnE5ZiA)

Wabash
10-12-2007, 12:32 PM
Well it has to be........sure as hell can't be all Bush!

Kurtz
10-12-2007, 12:35 PM
Well it has to be........sure as hell can't be all Bush!

bush is a liar 'n so is CondiLIEZA.
There's my simple thought for the day. :wink

Wabash
10-12-2007, 12:43 PM
bush is a liar 'n so is CondiLIEZA.
There's my simple thought for the day. :wink

Well, I totally disagree wit ya on that!

Yellowdogtexan
10-12-2007, 12:52 PM
I trust the UN and the IAEA far more than I trust liars like rice and bush. Again, these claims are just a repeat of the lies used to sell the war in Iraq.

Wabash
10-12-2007, 01:06 PM
I trust the UN and the IAEA far more than I trust liars like rice and bush. Again, these claims are just a repeat of the lies used to sell the war in Iraq.

Yada, yada, yada!

Lone Laugher
10-12-2007, 02:42 PM
It's not just Bush Adm. who thinks this is going on...obviously if ALL these countries are in agreement on some action....SOMETHING ain't kosher!


What f***ing agreement? Do you even read the stuff that you site?

Kurtz
10-12-2007, 02:55 PM
What f***ing agreement? Do you even read the stuff that you site?

:lmao

Hey, we still love Wabby! :love

Wabash
10-12-2007, 03:18 PM
What f***ing agreement? Do you even read the stuff that you site?

Well meathead, looks like you don't comprehend what you read!

But last month, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council - Britain, China, France the United States and Russia - and Germany "agreed" with the support of the European Union to hold off on a new sanctions resolution until November to allow negotiations with Iran to continue.

If Iran was doing NOTHING....then they wouldn't be agreeing on this action! To me, since they have agreed, it is an Agreement!
Not hard to understand if one is capable of understanding.

Kurtz
10-12-2007, 03:27 PM
Huh? :confused

Looks like a matter of interpretation to me. :lol

Wabash
10-12-2007, 03:45 PM
Huh? :confused

Looks like a matter of interpretation to me. :lol

Right...Even a 5th Grader can get it! I just went out and asked 2 of them, getting off the school bus...!:wink They told me..."well agreed, means agreed"! Must be the water in Central Florida!

Lone Laugher
10-12-2007, 07:33 PM
I mean......cite.....