Be Proud Liberals..Here is YOUR friends, the SPECIAL people

[Ringo]

I'll put this here so it can be moved somewhere for controlled speech! I can only hope these people are not allowed anywhere near kids or decent people, they are SUBHUMAN SLIMEBALLS! You Liberal Moms on here, do you want your kids exposed to this? I imagine Bill & Hillary kinda dig this as I know Nancy Pelosi does!:godzilla

http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://americansfortruth.com/news/tolerance-gone-wild-in-san-francisco-as-cops-stand-by-amidst-folsom-street-fairs-public-perversions-and-widespread-nudity.html

[Lone Laugher]

Well, isn't that a nice compliment to my morning coffee. You sure know where to find that gay porn, Ringo. That LaBarbera guy sure has a hard-on for gay people. What's the over-under on when he'll get caught having sex with another guy?

[Yellowdogtexan]

Ringo, this thread is stupid even for you. You are going to remain ignorant and clueless so long as you get what passes for information from wing nut daily (these guys are even more clueless than you are).

[crazierthanever]

Ringo, you certainly can pick your topics. Do you spend long nights searching for pictures of naked men?:hotdog

[Ringo]

Ringo, this thread is stupid even for you. You are going to remain ignorant and clueless so long as you get what passes for information from wing nut daily (these guys are even more clueless than you are).

Glad to see you ride to the rescue of these slimeballs, as it makes your "RINGO IGNORANCE" claims look pretty damned stupid for even a DNC Lawyer!

Scenario, you say you have Boys at home or did have makes no difference, would you condone this Celebration in your Neighborhood within view of your kids and wife? Try being HONEST as oposed to Liberal EVASIVE, IF possible??:sheep

[Ringo]

Ringo, you certainly can pick your topics. Do you spend long nights searching for pictures of naked men?:hotdog

No your wife sends them to me, tell her thanks and I am sorry for what she goes through!

Is this a MOVE ON tactic? Turn the VILENESS of the story into an attack on the Poster, using little ankle biters to nip at my heels!

Defend the Parade, defend the behavior, I need a girly boys view?:mw:mw

[sparks]

Ringo, this thread is stupid even for you. You are going to remain ignorant and clueless so long as you get what passes for information from wing nut daily (these guys are even more clueless than you are).


I'm curious...is there anyone that you think is as smart and informed as you? Inquiring minds wanna know. :rofl

[Lone Laugher]

Well, Ringo...lets see if you are capable of understanding why this parade is permitted.

While it is not my cup of tea....and I would not want my younger kids to witness this particular event, I do not have a problem with the event being held. If laws were broken during the event, the violators should have been arrested and charged. The same holds true for law breakers at Mardi Gras, a ball game or a state fair.

The issue that you have is not with the law being broken. It is the fact that your personal "moral meter" has been triggered. You do not think highly of gay people...and you do not want gay people to have a parade. Unfortunately for you....you don't get to make the laws for the City of San Francisco. The event was held legally.

My question to you is...where should the line be drawn? No gay and lesbian events? Outlaw porography? Eliminate nude beaches? Ban strip clubs? Make Hooters waitressess wear slacks and sweaters? Fine people for dancing too close?

Your "moral code" is not the same as mine...or the next person. That is why we have a process by which laws are passed....and by which people ( all kinds of people ) are afforded individual rights.


BTW...your dumb comments about the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi "digging" the parade do nothing to add credibility to your comments.

[Ringo]

Well, Ringo...lets see if you are capable of understanding why this parade is permitted.

While it is not my cup of tea....and I would not want my younger kids to witness this particular event, I do not have a problem with the event being held. If laws were broken during the event, the violators should have been arrested and charged. The same holds true for law breakers at Mardi Gras, a ball game or a state fair.

The issue that you have is not with the law being broken. It is the fact that your personal "moral meter" has been triggered. You do not think highly of gay people...and you do not want gay people to have a parade. Unfortunately for you....you don't get to make the laws for the City of San Francisco. The event was held legally.

My question to you is...where should the line be drawn? No gay and lesbian events? Outlaw porography? Eliminate nude beaches? Ban strip clubs? Make Hooters waitressess wear slacks and sweaters? Fine people for dancing too close?

Your "moral code" is not the same as mine...or the next person. That is why we have a process by which laws are passed....and by which people ( all kinds of people ) are afforded individual rights.


BTW...your dumb comments about the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi "digging" the parade do nothing to add credibility to your comments.

So for you , YOUR Moral meter allows MEN Jerking each other off or worse yet giving BLOW JOBS on the STREETS of our Cities, just A-OK?? Oh don't try to make me out as a standard bearer for Morals, BUT some things go way to far, and to up the Ante, You SHEEP have no problem with this!:godzilla:mw:mw:godzilla

[Ringo]

Ringo, this thread is stupid even for you. You are going to remain ignorant and clueless so long as you get what passes for information from wing nut daily (these guys are even more clueless than you are).

Do you somehow kinda feel like this is a "personal" attack or are you just FEELING THEIR PAIN? I got your Rep BS, did you send one to wacko boy too?:sheep:godzilla

[The Q]

I'll put this here so it can be moved somewhere for controlled speech!

:ringo

Well, Ringo, I'm pleased to say that you posted it in the unmoderated forum. No need to move it anywhere.

I'm not exactly sure if you understand how the new board works, but the unmoderated section is just for these types of argumentative, ranting threads!

:woot

Somehow I feel that you are failing to grasp the innovative new board concept. I would LOVE the opportunity to explain it to you AGAIN, but it might be better if you read it for yourself: http://www.forums.thepoliticalasylum.com/showthread.php?t=12336

ADQ

[The Q]

So for you , YOUR Moral meter allows MEN Jerking each other off or worse yet giving BLOW JOBS on the STREETS of our Cities, just A-OK?? Oh don't try to make me out as a standard bearer for Morals, BUT some things go way to far, and to up the Ante, You SHEEP have no problem with this!:godzilla:mw:mw:godzilla

I'm actually going to have to go with Ringo on this. This is not a moral judgment on people. Lord knows I enjoy the freaky-deaky in the privacy of my own home. But there are laws against indecent exposure--and there's nothing wrong for expecting a higher standard of conduct and behavior in public locations than in private ones.

In my opinion, it has nothing to do with "morality". It has everything to do with having a society where everyone is comfortable walking the streets.

ADQ

[crazierthanever]

No your wife sends them to me, tell her thanks and I am sorry for what she goes through!

Is this a MOVE ON tactic? Turn the VILENESS of the story into an attack on the Poster, using little ankle biters to nip at my heels!

Defend the Parade, defend the behavior, I need a girly boys view?:mw:mw

I don't have a wife, Ringo. I have a big ole USMC husband, sorry to disappoint you and no I won't introduce him to you.:kurtz

I'm not defending public sex acts. They're not my cuppa tea. I'm making fun of you deriding public officials who have NOTHING to do with the event. If you don't live in San Francisco and don't often visit there then WHY do you care? People who live near the area didn't seem bothered according to the article.

If the guy who wrote the article (and seemed to get his jollies off photographing guy on guy action) knew what he would see why did he go unless he wanted to cause trouble. I'm willing to wager that countries that have ACCEPTED homosexuals as full members of society with all the rights you have don't have the events like the one you're referring to. People who feel they are accepted for who they are don't have to go to extremes.

Now go have a good day and stop looking at gay porn.:theman

[crazierthanever]

I'm actually going to have to go with Ringo on this. This is not a moral judgment on people. Lord knows I enjoy the freaky-deaky in the privacy of my own home. But there are laws against indecent exposure--and there's nothing wrong for expecting a higher standard of conduct and behavior in public locations than in private ones.

In my opinion, it has nothing to do with "morality". It has everything to do with having a society where everyone is comfortable walking the streets.

ADQ

I'm not happy to see guys doin each other in public either, Q. It's not necessary. But as I told Ringo I think the extreme behavior is a response to the extreme prejudice against gays in this culture. There's always nut jobs at the far ends of any spectrum.

[Ringo]

I'm not happy to see guys doin each other in public either, Q. It's not necessary. But as I told Ringo I think the extreme behavior is a response to the extreme prejudice against gays in this culture. There's always nut jobs at the far ends of any spectrum.

Now thats funny you didn't insult Q on her responce, or try to implicate she liked Gay Porn like you did me, once again showing me your prejudice against real men! Glad your husband was a Marine, we need MEN in this Nation! No crazy, I got a beautiful fiance, probably to good for me, but women are my choice, always have been, always will be! Your cheap move on tactic of attempting reverse the attack is right up there with thier 3rd grade mentality! Tell your husband I was a forward spotter in Desert Storm, he will know what you mean and also how pleasent an assignment that can be!

[The Q]

Now thats funny you didn't insult Q on her responce, or try to implicate she liked Gay Porn like you did me, once again showing me your prejudice against real men! Glad your husband was a Marine, we need MEN in this Nation! No crazy, I got a beautiful fiance, probably to good for me, but women are my choice, always have been, always will be! Your cheap move on tactic of attempting reverse the attack is right up there with thier 3rd grade mentality! Tell your husband I was a forward spotter in Desert Storm, he will know what you mean and also how pleasent an assignment that can be!

I thought it was just a known fact that I like gay porn. :dunno


ADQ

[Capitalist]

I'm curious...is there anyone that you think is as smart and informed as you? Inquiring minds wanna know. :rofl

Thanks for quoting him, it is the only way I can read is ignorant insulting rants.

I am sure there is no one that he considers his equal. Not just here but worldwide.

As smart as I am even I realize there are at least some people who are my equal or better. Hell My CEO and our companies Medical director are both smarter than me.

[Capitalist]

Well, Ringo...lets see if you are capable of understanding why this parade is permitted.

While it is not my cup of tea....and I would not want my younger kids to witness this particular event, I do not have a problem with the event being held. If laws were broken during the event, the violators should have been arrested and charged. The same holds true for law breakers at Mardi Gras, a ball game or a state fair.

The issue that you have is not with the law being broken. It is the fact that your personal "moral meter" has been triggered. You do not think highly of gay people...and you do not want gay people to have a parade. Unfortunately for you....you don't get to make the laws for the City of San Francisco. The event was held legally.

My question to you is...where should the line be drawn? No gay and lesbian events? Outlaw porography? Eliminate nude beaches? Ban strip clubs? Make Hooters waitressess wear slacks and sweaters? Fine people for dancing too close?

Your "moral code" is not the same as mine...or the next person. That is why we have a process by which laws are passed....and by which people ( all kinds of people ) are afforded individual rights.


BTW...your dumb comments about the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi "digging" the parade do nothing to add credibility to your comments.

They have laws pertaining to this kind of stuff in SF?

They won't let the military in , they won't let the boy scouts get city funding.

But they are fine with this.

Personally I don't care either way, the homosexuals just need to keep their hands of my ass and I am fine with them.

[toxic]

So for you , YOUR Moral meter allows MEN Jerking each other off or worse yet giving BLOW JOBS on the STREETS of our Cities, just A-OK?? Oh don't try to make me out as a standard bearer for Morals, BUT some things go way to far, and to up the Ante, You SHEEP have no problem with this!:godzilla:mw:mw:godzilla

If you have ever been to a public beach, you may have noticed Hertosexual couples pull a blanket over them as they screw or dither with twinkys and doughnuts.

I have never observed even the most Conservative people (Orange County, CA) bother to go down, throw the blanket off and perform a citizen's arrest. It seems, that one beach blanket getting pulled up, leads to another and another ...

At the Bally's gym I go to in Plano, TX (which is the 5th most conservative city in the USA), I have witnessed a Hertosexual couple jerking each other off in the steam room about 3 months ago. None of us outside in the hot tub, viewing through the partically obscrured glass, seemed to mind.